前脚刚融资2.5个亿，后脚就被人“扒皮”。哪怕在奇葩频出的互联网，这也算得上是一出好戏了。
The front foot has just been financed by 250 million and then it's been “skinned”. Even on the strange Internet, that's a good thing.
?
?
“解剖”
?
8月15日，不少IT媒体都报道了一则创投消息——红芯宣布完成2.5亿元C轮系列融资。作为一家名不见经传的初创企业，能吸引上亿的投资，的确是一桩喜事，但真正关注到的人并不多。
On August 15, a number of IT media reported on a creative project, the red core of
?
红芯提供的通稿称，红芯研发了具有我国自主知识产权的浏览器核心，推出了世界第五颗也是唯一一颗属于中国人自己的浏览器内核——红芯Redcore。世界上四大主流浏览器内核为微软IE浏览器内核Trident、谷歌Chrome浏览器内核Blink、苹果Safari内核Webkit和火狐浏览器内核Gecko。
The red core provides a draft saying that the red core has developed the core of the browser with our autonomous intellectual property rights, and has launched the world's fifth and only one of China's own browsers, Redcore. , the four main browsers in the world, the microsoft IE browser, Trident, Google Chrome browser, Blink, Apple Safari, Webkit, and Fire Fox browser, Gecko.
?
?
但仅隔一天，红芯就火了，不是因为融资，也不是因为“中国人的”内核，而是有人将它“解剖”了。
But in just one day, the red core is on fire, not because of financing, not because of the “Chinese” kernel, but because it has been “aggressed”.
?
微信公号@小声比比 从红芯官网上下载了红芯浏览器安装包exe文档，安装程序Redcore.exe的属性竟然显示为Chrome，经过了多次解压后，还找到了谷歌Chrome两年前旧版本，甚至还有Chrome的logo。
The microphone @low voice ratio downloaded the red core browser installs the exe document from the red corer web, the installation program Redcore.exe's properties were shown as Chrome, and, after several decompressions, Google Chrome's old version was found two years ago, even Chrome's logo.
?
?
不仅如此，博主还发现了另一个“bug”，因为谷歌Chrome有一个众人皆知的彩蛋，在断网状态下会出现恐龙赛跑的小游戏，拿红芯浏览器试试，果然一断网，小恐龙就蹦跶出来了。
In addition, the blogger found another “bug”, because Google Chrome had a well-known egg, and there would be a little game of dinosaur races in a state of disconnection, with a red core browser, and the little dinosaur would pop out of the net.
?
?
“说好的国产机芯呢？拿Chrome两年前的版本，封装一下就可以当成国产内核浏览器的骄傲了。” @小声比比 如是问道。
"Where's the national core? Take the Chrome version two years ago and wrap it up as a pride of the national kernel browser."
?
这篇微信推文就像一根刺，把“牛皮鼓鼓”的红芯扎破了……
This tweet, like a thorn, punctured the red core of the "cow drum."
?
质疑声纷至沓来，红芯第一时间取消了安装包下载。“解剖”无法继续，但舆论还在发酵。
The question came up and the red core cancelled the package download at the very first time. The anatomy could not continue, but public opinion was fermented.
?
16日下午，红芯联合创始人高婧回应称，网上文章断章取义，安装包里之所以有Chrome文件，因为本来就是基于开源的Chrome架构。但红芯依然是自主可控的国产内核，因为有智能感知渲染等其他方面的创新。她还说，红芯浏览器“包含‘Chrome’在里面”，但并非抄袭，而是“站在巨人的肩膀上去做创新”。
In the afternoon, the founder of the Red Throat Consortium, Takashi, responded that the web article was out of context and that the Chrome file was in the package because it was based on the open source Chrome structure. But the red core was still a self-controlled national kernel because of other innovations, such as intelligent perception rendering. She added that the
?
就这样，“站在巨人的肩膀去做创新”一句话也成了网友们反讽的槽点。
So, the phrase "inventing on the shoulders of giants" has become a counterpoint for the Internet.
?
到了晚上，红芯时代（北京）科技有限公司终于发布了一纸声明：红芯浏览器内核是基于通用的浏览器内核架构(即Chromium开源项目，但不是Chrome浏览器)的基础上进行技术创新的；区别于传统的浏览器，红芯浏览器是专门针对企业办公场景设计的国际浏览器，内核技术是不断迭代更新的，红芯浏览器内核 Redcore是基于 Chromium/Bnk。
At night, the Red Core Age (Beijing) Technology Ltd. finally issued a paper statement that the kernel is based on a common kernel structure (i.e. the Chromium Open Source Project, but not the Chrome Browser); that unlike the traditional browser, the kernel browser is an international browser designed specifically for the business landscape, that the kernel is constantly updated, and that the kernel is based on Chromium/Bnk.
?
?
此外，红芯还坚称，浏览器内核的技术创新体现在三个方面：
In addition, the red core maintains that technological innovations in the core of the browser are reflected in three areas:
?
一是红芯隐遁，让企业应用系统隐身，只对特定身份和设备可见，从而有效避免外部可能的攻击，帮助企业解决上云和移动化的安全问题。
The first is the hidden red core, which allows business applications to be invisible and visible only to specific identities and equipment, thus effectively avoiding possible external attacks and helping businesses to address cloud and mobile security issues.
?
二是红芯云适配，将企业PC端系统适配至移动端，帮助企业快速实现移动办公。
The second is the compatibility of the red core cloud, which adapts the enterprise PC end-of-end system to the mobile end and helps the enterprise to move its office quickly.
?
三是安全可控，通过私有DNS、加密缓存、国密算法等功能，帮助企业保护数据和隐私。
Third, it is safe and manageable to help businesses protect data and privacy through such functions as private DNS, encryption caches, national secret algorithms, etc.
?
总之，红芯承认了内核用的是谷歌的，但加了一些技术创新，所以自以为也算是国产内核。
In short, the red core recognizes that the kernel is Googled, but with some technological innovations, it is thought to be a national kernel.
?
?
疑点
?
随着越来越多的细节浮出水面，更多关于红芯的疑问也随之而来。
With more and more details coming out of the water, more questions about the red core >/span'.
?
疑问一：用了谷歌的内核，为何宣称是具有我国自主知识产权？
?
红芯创始人兼CEO陈本峰答新浪科技提问时，强调红芯是自主创新，不是自主研发——“我们一直讲的自主创新，它和自主研发有很大差别。创新算是我们的原创技术。而自主研发则是代表每行代码自己写，这个国内现在没人能完成，四大内核现在全是美国人的。我们也没有必要再去写初始代码。我理解的原创，就是别人没有我有，我们的三个原创功能就是别人没有的。”
When the founder of the red core and CEO Chen Feng answered questions about the new wave technology, he stressed that the red core was an autonomous innovation, not an autonomous R & D -- "We've been talking about autonomous innovation, it's very different from autonomous R & D. Innovation is our original technology. And autonomous R & D is written on behalf of every line of code. No one in the country can do it, and the four cores are now all American. We don't need to write the initial code. I understand that the original idea is that no one else has me, and our three original functions are none."
?
他还说：“客户买产品是为了价值，它跟国产、爱国没有任何关系，是商业行为，我给你创造价值，你给我钱。”
He also said, “The customer buys the product for value, it has nothing to do with national production, patriotism, business behavior, I create value for you, you give me money.”
?
红芯联合创始人高婧也有类似的表态，她称，用户购买是因为红芯浏览器本身好用，而不是因为它是“国产”，红芯没有用‘国产浏览器’的概念骗钱。
Similar statements were made by the co-founder of the red core joint, Takashi, who stated that the user purchased the red core browser because it was useful, not because it was “national”, and that the
?
?
疑问二：红芯浏览器为何会主动下架？
?
高婧给出的解释是因为技术部启动应急预案，开始自查。但是陈本峰却有另一套说辞：“本想大事化小，但事件发酵得太快了，我们随时会将产品上架，而且不会改任何东西。”
The explanation given by Takagi is that the Technical Department initiated the emergency plan and started to investigate itself. But Chen was given another phrase: "I wanted to be small, but the event was too fast, and we're going to put the product on the shelf, and we're not going to change anything."
?
截止发稿前，红芯浏览器安装包仍未上线。
The red core browser installation is still not online before
?
疑问三：红芯背后的投资方到底有谁？
?
根据公开资料显示，在2.5亿C轮融资之前，红芯就曾有过四轮融资，分别是：2013年11月获科大讯飞300万人民币天使轮融资；2013年12月获天创资本、虎童基金1000万人民币A轮融资；2015年6月获IDG、晨兴资本1000万美元B轮融资；2016年11月获达晨创投领投的B+轮1亿元人民币融资。
According to public information, before 250 million C rounds of financing, the red core had four rounds of financing, namely: 3 million renminbi angels in November 2013, 10 million yuan renminbi in December 2013 for Surgeon Capital, Tiger Child Fund, and 10 million yuan yuan yuan in June 2015, and 100 million yuan yuan yuan yuan in November 2016 for the B+in early morning investment.
?
但令人生疑的是，不少投资人却纷纷撇清关系。
It is doubtful, however, that many investors are evading their ties.
?
科大讯飞表示未投资过该企业，而是讯飞的关联公司在2013年天使投资的一个项目。该关联公司为“讯飞产投”，由刘庆峰等17名个人持股。
It says that it did not invest in the company, but that it was a project of an angel-invested company in 2013. The company is a “flying-out” with 17 individuals, including Liu Qingfeng, holding shares.
?
森马服饰的控股股东森马集团有限公司也被爆出持股红芯1%，但森马服饰却回应称，上市公司并未投资红芯浏览器。
Samma Group Limited, a controlling shareholder in Samma's clothing, was also blown out with 1 per cent of the stake red core, but the Samma's apparel responded that the listed company did not invest in red core browsers.
?
疑问四：创始团队成员履历是否涉假？
?
此前有报道称，陈本峰20岁遇到科大讯飞创始董事长、中文语音合成技术专家王仁华教授，由于编程能力出众，陈本峰被他的本科导师推荐进入了当时的初始团队。
Previously, it was reported that Chen was 20 years old when he met Professor Wang In-hwa, Founding Chairman of the Science Majors and an expert in Chinese speech synthesis technology, and that Chen was recommended by his undergraduate mentor to enter the original team at that time because of his outstanding programming skills.
?
但科大讯飞却回应称，陈本峰不是讯飞创始成员，其本科曾在讯飞实习过。
, however, responded that Chen Beng Feng was not a founding member and that his undergraduates had practiced on Quest.
?
自媒体人@雷建平 也指出高婧涉及学历造假。高婧曾经的个人介绍，自称毕业于香港科技大学商学院及哈佛大学。但真实情况是，高婧并非毕业于哈佛大学，只在哈佛大学交流。如今，这一错误已被修正。
From the media @Li Jianping also points out that Takagi is involved in academic forgery. Takagi's personal introduction, claiming to have graduated from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Business School and Harvard University. But the reality is that does not graduate from Harvard University, but only communicates at Harvard University.
?
?
疑问五：国务院、国资委真的是红芯的客户吗？
?
红芯曾披露，红芯已成为国务院、国资委、中远海运、国家电网、比亚迪、海信、中粮可口可乐、等政企机构的工作平台标配，平均单价在一百万到三百万元，最大的订单卖到五百万元。
The red core has revealed that it has become the work platform of government agencies such as the State Department, the National Finance Committee, the China-China Maritime Service, the National Power Network, Biadi, Hysin, the Chinese Food Coca-Cola, etc., with an average unit price of between $1 million and $3 million, with the largest order sold to $5 million.
?
?
但是国务院国资委一位内部人士告诉澎湃新闻记者，国资委的个人电脑中没有统一安装红芯浏览器，现在都是根据个人爱好自行选择浏览器，也没有通知要求安装此软件。据其了解，国务院国资委并未购买红芯公司的服务。
However, an insider of the State Committee of the State Council told journalists that there was no uniform red core browser in the personal computer of the State Committee of the State of `strong', and that it was now based on a personal hobby to select its own browser and did not notify that it was required to install the software. It was understood that the State Committee of the State Council did not purchase the services of the red core company.
?
中车集团内部人士也称，中车集团层面使用的电脑并未安装红芯浏览器，下属子公司层面则不确认。
According to insider groups, no red core browser was installed on the computers used at the Chinese-car consortium level, and no confirmation was given at the subsidiary level.
?
海信集团官方也表示，海信不是红芯浏览器的用户。
Hein Group officials also indicated that it was not a user of a red core browser.
?
对此，陈本峰表示：“我们不是要骗什么国家资金，我们没有拿过国家的钱，我们的客户都是企业用户，并没有特别强调政府用户。”
In response, Chen Ben Feng stated: “We are not trying to cheat on State funds, we have not taken State money, our clients are business users, and there is no special emphasis on government users”.
?
《财经》采访的一位红芯产品深度知情人士也称：“红芯最大问题在于过度宣传和模糊宣传，但初衷不是要骗国家资金。”
“The biggest problem with the red core is over-advocacy and vague propaganda, but it was not intended to defraud State funds”.
?
?
浮躁心理
?
红芯一事，折射出一些企业的浮躁心理。
The red core thing, it's refracturing some of the corporate vibes.
?
@澎湃新闻 批评说，明明就是基于他人开源技术，却只字不提，反而高调宣传“红芯就是做中国自己的内核”，“掌握内核技术，企业才能真正做到应用安全”，甚至列出一系列政府官网为自己产品背书，把朴素的家国情怀换算成满满的商业算计。
@News: While it's based on open-source technology, they don't say a word, they're high-profile about “red cores are China's own kernels”, “have in-house nuclear technology so that companies can actually apply it safely”, even listing a series of government networks that have endorsed their products,
?
“在高科技领域进行自主创新，虽不是高不可攀，但也必须摈弃动辄就想跨越式、抄近道的浮躁心理。”@光明网 还表示，更要对那些为了拿项目、“钓”融资而不惜伪造技术、剽窃产品的伪创新行为进行毫不留情的揭露和打击，对那些打着什么“争光”幌子实际进行坑钱骗名的伪创新者及其机构，必须绳之以法，才能以儆效尤。
“Initiating autonomous innovation in the high-tech field, although not too ambitious, must also abandon the vexing spirit of trying to cross and close the road.” @Lightnet also said that even more than unremitting revelations and attacks on fraudulent innovations that falsify technology and steal products in order to finance projects, “fishing”, the strong must bring to justice those innovators and their institutions who actually cheat on money under the guise of what's a “light fight”. >.
?
仅仅“披了一层皮”，为何就能吸引来2.5亿的融资呢？
Why would it attract $250 million in financing if it were simply “a layer of skin”.
?
一位不愿意透露姓名的投资人向@财经网 表示，“软件行业，抄袭模仿一部分是常事，但是对于核心模块全盘照抄，还说自己独创，这就是人品问题。另外，技术层面的抄袭，很多投资机构投进去的时候其实是不清楚的。红芯的投资人这次应该是掉沟里了。”
An unnamed investor said to @FinancialNet, "Software industry, copying is a part of the routine, but it's a matter of character to take a complete look at the core module and say it's original. And, at the technical level, it's not clear when many investment agencies go in. The red-core investor should have fallen into a ditch this time."
?
另一位早期投资人也表示，现在投资机构还没到审代码的水平，专家给的意见也不见得全面、深入，毕竟精力有限且不存在太多利益关系。技术类早期项目是赌赛道、投人，人靠谱、背景光鲜、有成功履历、业绩认可，就出手了，B轮以后的项目一面是已有机构背书，一面是市场部分验证。
Another early investor also said that ‘strong’ was not yet at the level of the code review, and that the experts’ advice was not comprehensive and in-depth, after all, with limited energy and little interest. Early projects in the /strong technology category were gambling tracks, investors, people with a unique background, successful resumes, and performance recognition.
?
?
?
注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群
打开微信扫一扫
添加客服
进入交流群
发表评论